Fix: a calculation error in the example of dividing out in the 02_layout_algebra doc (#2635)
This commit is contained in:
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ For example,
|
||||
* `(3,6,2,8) / 9 => (1,2,2,8)`
|
||||
* `(3,6,2,8) / 72 => (1,1,1,4)`
|
||||
|
||||
To compute the strides of the strided layout, the residues of the above operation are used to scale the strides of `A`. For instance, the last example `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) / 72` with strides `(w,x,y,z)` produces `(3*w,6*x,2*x,2*z)` as the strides of the strided layout.
|
||||
To compute the strides of the strided layout, the residues of the above operation are used to scale the strides of `A`. For instance, the last example `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) / 72` with strides `(w,x,y,z)` produces `(72*w,24*x,4*y,2*z)` as the strides of the strided layout.
|
||||
|
||||
As you may have noticed, we can only divide shapes by certain values and get a sensible result. This is called the **stride divisibility condition** and is statically checked in CuTe when possible.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ This operation causes the result to have a shape that is compatible with `B`.
|
||||
|
||||
Again, this operation must satisfy a **shape divisibility condition** to yield a sensible result and is statically checked in CuTe when possible.
|
||||
|
||||
From the above examples, we can construct the composition `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) o 16:9 = (1,2,2,4):(3*w,3*x,y,z)`.
|
||||
From the above examples, we can construct the composition `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) o 16:9 = (1,2,2,4):(9*w,3*x,y,z)`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
#### Example 1 -- Worked Example of Calculating a Composition
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user