**Summary**
This PR tackles a significant memory bottleneck when processing
image-heavy Word documents. Previously, our pipeline eagerly decoded
DOCX images into `PIL.Image` objects, which caused high peak memory
usage. To solve this, I've introduced a **lazy-loading approach**:
images are now stored as raw blobs and only decoded exactly when and
where they are consumed.
This successfully reduces the memory footprint while keeping the parsing
output completely identical to before.
**What's Changed**
Instead of a dry file-by-file list, here is the logical breakdown of the
updates:
* **The Core Abstraction (`lazy_image.py`)**: Introduced `LazyDocxImage`
along with helper APIs to handle lazy decoding, image-type checks, and
NumPy compatibility. It also supports `.close()` and detached PIL access
to ensure safe lifecycle management and prevent memory leaks.
* **Pipeline Integration (`naive.py`, `figure_parser.py`, etc.)**:
Updated the general DOCX picture extraction to return these new lazy
images. Downstream consumers (like the figure/VLM flow and base64
encoding paths) now decode images right at the use site using detached
PIL instances, avoiding shared-instance side effects.
* **Compatibility Hooks (`operators.py`, `book.py`, etc.)**: Added
necessary compatibility conversions so these lazy images flow smoothly
through existing merging, filtering, and presentation steps without
breaking.
**Scope & What is Intentionally Left Out**
To keep this PR focused, I have restricted these changes strictly to the
**general Word pipeline** and its downstream consumers.
The `QA` and `manual` Word parsing pipelines are explicitly **not
modified** in this PR. They can be safely migrated to this new lazy-load
model in a subsequent, standalone PR.
**Design Considerations**
I briefly considered adding image compression during processing, but
decided against it to avoid any potential quality degradation in the
derived outputs. I also held off on a massive pipeline re-architecture
to avoid overly invasive changes right now.
**Validation & Testing**
I've tested this to ensure no regressions:
* Compared identical DOCX inputs before and after this branch: chunk
counts, extracted text, table HTML, and image descriptions match
perfectly.
* **Confirmed a noticeable drop in peak memory usage when processing
image-dense documents.** For a 30MB Word document containing 243 1080p
screenshots, memory consumption is reduced by approximately 1.5GB.
**Breaking Changes**
None.
Addresses a potential RCE vulnerability in NormalizeImage by using
ast.literal_eval for safer string parsing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
This patch drop useless fastext which is seems useless in the code base
and its very kind of hard install
should close#4498
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <zouzou0208@gmail.com>
Use `np.float32()` instead.
### What problem does this PR solve?
Using `eval()` can lead to code injections.
I think `eval()` is only used to parse a floating point number here.
This change preserves the correct behavior if the string `"None"` is
supplied. But if that behavior isn't intended then this part could be
just deleted instead, since `np.float32()` is parsing strings anyway:
```Python
if isinstance(scale, str):
scale = eval(scale)
```
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Use consistent log file names, introduced initLogger
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
substract -> subtract
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### What problem does this PR solve?
Related source file is in Windows/DOS format, they are format to Unix
format.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
