### What problem does this PR solve?
remove delete_documents uuid validation
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_parser
HTTP API: PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API
PATCH /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: GET /v1/document/thumbnails
After migration: GET /api/v1/thumbnails
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/run
After migration: POST /api/v1/documents/ingest/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/change_status
After consolidation, Restful API
POST /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/batch-update-status
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration: POST /v1/document/upload_info/
After migration: POST /api/v1/documentss/upload/
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
The POST /upload_info?url=<url> endpoint accepted a user-supplied URL
and passed it directly to AsyncWebCrawler without any validation. There
were no restrictions on URL scheme, destination hostname, or resolved IP
address. This allowed any authenticated user to instruct the server to
make outbound HTTP requests to internal infrastructure — including RFC
1918 private networks, loopback addresses, and cloud metadata services
such as http://169.254.169.254 — effectively using the server as a proxy
for internal network reconnaissance or credential theft.
This PR adds an SSRF guard (_validate_url_for_crawl) that runs before
any crawl is initiated. It enforces an allowlist of safe schemes
(http/https), resolves the hostname at validation time, and rejects any
URL whose resolved IP falls within a private or reserved network range.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/metadata/update
After migration, Restful API
PATCH /api/v2/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/metadatas
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before migration
Web API: POST /v1/document/update_metadata_setting
After consolidation, Restful API
PUT
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents/<document_id>/metadata/config
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/rm
Http API - DELETE /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- DELETE
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/infos
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents?ids=id1&ids=id2
### Type of change
- [ ] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/filter
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents?type=filter
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/list
Http API - GET /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Consolidation WEB API & HTTP API for document upload
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /v1/document/upload
Http API - POST /api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
After consolidation, Restful API -- POST
/api/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/documents
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Consolidation WEB API & HTTP API for document metadata summary
Before consolidation
Web API: POST /api/v1/document/metadata/summary
Http API - GET /v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/metadata/summary
After consolidation, Restful API -- GET
/v1/datasets/<dataset_id>/metadata/summary
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
fix: support dense_vector from ES fields response (ES 9.x compatibility)
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Configuration Chore (non-breaking change which updates
configuration)
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* More accurate handling and unwrapping of dense-vector fields so
returned values have correct shapes.
* Field selection reliably limits returned data and falls back to
alternate result locations when needed.
* Use of consistent result IDs and tolerant handling when score values
are missing.
* **Chores / Configuration**
* Increased build memory and adjusted build-time flags for the frontend
build.
* Simplified runtime model/GPU checks and removed an automated runtime
GPU-install attempt.
* **Build Fixes**
* `web/vite.config.ts`: make `build.minify` and `build.sourcemap`
respect `VITE_MINIFY` and `VITE_BUILD_SOURCEMAP` env vars from
Dockerfile instead of hardcoding `terser` and `true`.
* **Environment**
* Allow stack version override and default the runtime image tag to
"latest".
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Correct unwrapping of dense-vector fields and reliable field selection
with fallback locations.
* Consistent use of hit-level IDs and tolerant handling when score
values are missing.
* **Chores / Configuration**
* Increased frontend build memory and added build-time minify/sourcemap
flags; build minification and sourcemap now configurable.
* Removed runtime GPU detection for model initialization; force CPU
initialization.
* **Environment**
* Allow stack version override and default runtime image tag to
"latest".
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Refactor: merge document.rename into document.update_document
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Added a unified document update API (PUT) supporting name, metadata,
parser/chunk settings, and status changes.
* **Breaking Changes**
* Legacy single-parameter rename endpoint removed; renames now require
dataset + document identifiers.
* `/list` now reads dataset id from a different query parameter.
* **Validation / Bug Fixes**
* Stricter meta_fields and parser-config validation; unauthenticated
requests return 401.
* **Frontend**
* UI now sends dataset id when saving document names.
* **Tests**
* Numerous unit and HTTP tests adjusted or removed to match new API and
validations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MkDev11 <94194147+MkDev11@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mkdev11 <YOUR_GITHUB_ID+MkDev11@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mkdev11 <MkDev11@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Qi Wang <wangq8@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: dataCenter430 <161712630+dataCenter430@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: balibabu <cike8899@users.noreply.github.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
As title.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Standardized the query parameter used when listing documents so
listings behave consistently across the web and client interfaces.
* Clarified the error message shown when a required dataset ID is
missing to give clearer guidance to users.
* **Tests**
* Updated test coverage to reflect the standardized dataset identifier
usage.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Files /file API to RESTFul style.
### Type of change
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Co-authored-by: writinwaters <cai.keith@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liu An <asiro@qq.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Split dataset api to gateway and service, and modify web UI to use
restful http api.
2. Old KB releated APIs are commented.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
---------
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
using builtin model when parsing gave an error because it expects
fid==builtin. split_model_name_and_factory returns id=None. pr allows
the model to be accepted wheter with or without @Builtin
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Split dataset api to gateway and service, and modify web UI to use
restful http api.
2. Old KB releated APIs are commented.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
1. Split dataset api to gateway and service, and modify web UI to use
restful http api.
2. Old KB releated APIs are commented.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Codecov’s coverage report shows that several RAGFlow code paths are
currently untested or under-tested. This makes it easier for regressions
to slip in during refactors and feature work.
This PR adds targeted automated tests to cover the files and branches
highlighted by Codecov, improving confidence in core behavior while
keeping runtime functionality unchanged.
### Type of change
- [x] Other (please describe): Test coverage improvement (adds/extends
unit and integration tests to address Codecov-reported gaps)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Codecov’s coverage report shows that several RAGFlow code paths are
currently untested or under-tested. This makes it easier for regressions
to slip in during refactors and feature work.
This PR adds targeted automated tests to cover the files and branches
highlighted by Codecov, improving confidence in core behavior while
keeping runtime functionality unchanged.
### Type of change
- [x] Other (please describe): Test coverage improvement (adds/extends
unit and integration tests to address Codecov-reported gaps)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Changed test priorities in multiple test files, downgrading from p1 to
p2 and p2 to p3.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR adds missing web API tests (system, search, KB, LLM, plugin,
connector). It also addresses a contract mismatch that was causing test
failures: metadata updates did not persist new keys (update‑only
behavior).
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Other (please describe): Test coverage expansion and test helper
instrumentation
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fixes web API behavior mismatches that caused test failures by
normalizing error responses, tightening validations, correcting error
messages, and closing upload file handles.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
- Add new test suite for document app with
create/list/parse/upload/remove tests
- Update API URLs to use version variable from config in HTTP and web
API tests
### Type of change
- [x] Add test cases
