* ops: dont take an offload stream if you dont need one
* ops: prioritize mem transfer
The async offload streams reason for existence is to transfer from
RAM to GPU. The post processing compute steps are a bonus on the side
stream, but if the compute stream is running a long kernel, it can
stall the side stream, as it wait to type-cast the bias before
transferring the weight. So do a pure xfer of the weight straight up,
then do everything bias, then go back to fix the weight type and do
weight patches.
* execution: Roll the UI cache into the outputs
Currently the UI cache is parallel to the output cache with
expectations of being a content superset of the output cache.
At the same time the UI and output cache are maintained completely
seperately, making it awkward to free the output cache content without
changing the behaviour of the UI cache.
There are two actual users (getters) of the UI cache. The first is
the case of a direct content hit on the output cache when executing a
node. This case is very naturally handled by merging the UI and outputs
cache.
The second case is the history JSON generation at the end of the prompt.
This currently works by asking the cache for all_node_ids and then
pulling the cache contents for those nodes. all_node_ids is the nodes
of the dynamic prompt.
So fold the UI cache into the output cache. The current UI cache setter
now writes to a prompt-scope dict. When the output cache is set, just
get this value from the dict and tuple up with the outputs.
When generating the history, simply iterate prompt-scope dict.
This prepares support for more complex caching strategies (like RAM
pressure caching) where less than 1 workflow will be cached and it
will be desirable to keep the UI cache and output cache in sync.
* sd: Implement RAM getter for VAE
* model_patcher: Implement RAM getter for ModelPatcher
* sd: Implement RAM getter for CLIP
* Implement RAM Pressure cache
Implement a cache sensitive to RAM pressure. When RAM headroom drops
down below a certain threshold, evict RAM-expensive nodes from the
cache.
Models and tensors are measured directly for RAM usage. An OOM score
is then computed based on the RAM usage of the node.
Note the due to indirection through shared objects (like a model
patcher), multiple nodes can account the same RAM as their individual
usage. The intent is this will free chains of nodes particularly
model loaders and associate loras as they all score similar and are
sorted in close to each other.
Has a bias towards unloading model nodes mid flow while being able
to keep results like text encodings and VAE.
* execution: Convert the cache entry to NamedTuple
As commented in review.
Convert this to a named tuple and abstract away the tuple type
completely from graph.py.
* mm: factor out the current stream getter
Make this a reusable function.
* ops: sync the offload stream with the consumption of w&b
This sync is nessacary as pytorch will queue cuda async frees on the
same stream as created to tensor. In the case of async offload, this
will be on the offload stream.
Weights and biases can go out of scope in python which then
triggers the pytorch garbage collector to queue the free operation on
the offload stream possible before the compute stream has used the
weight. This causes a use after free on weight data leading to total
corruption of some workflows.
So sync the offload stream with the compute stream after the weight
has been used so the free has to wait for the weight to be used.
The cast_bias_weight is extended in a backwards compatible way with
the new behaviour opt-in on a defaulted parameter. This handles
custom node packs calling cast_bias_weight and defeatures
async-offload for them (as they do not handle the race).
The pattern is now:
cast_bias_weight(... , offloadable=True) #This might be offloaded
thing(weight, bias, ...)
uncast_bias_weight(...)
* controlnet: adopt new cast_bias_weight synchronization scheme
This is nessacary for safe async weight offloading.
* mm: sync the last stream in the queue, not the next
Currently this peeks ahead to sync the next stream in the queue of
streams with the compute stream. This doesnt allow a lot of
parallelization, as then end result is you can only get one weight load
ahead regardless of how many streams you have.
Rotate the loop logic here to synchronize the end of the queue before
returning the next stream. This allows weights to be loaded ahead of the
compute streams position.
In the case of --cache-none lazy and subgraph execution can cause
anything to be run multiple times per workflow. If that rerun nodes is
in itself a subgraph generator, this will crash for two reasons.
pending_subgraph_results[] does not cleanup entries after their use.
So when a pending_subgraph_result is consumed, remove it from the list
so that if the corresponding node is fully re-executed this misses
lookup and it fall through to execute the node as it should.
Secondly, theres is an explicit enforcement against dups in the
addition of subgraphs nodes as ephemerals to the dymprompt. Remove this
enforcement as the use case is now valid.
* Implement mixed precision operations with a registry design and metadate for quant spec in checkpoint.
* Updated design using Tensor Subclasses
* Fix FP8 MM
* An actually functional POC
* Remove CK reference and ensure correct compute dtype
* Update unit tests
* ruff lint
* Implement mixed precision operations with a registry design and metadate for quant spec in checkpoint.
* Updated design using Tensor Subclasses
* Fix FP8 MM
* An actually functional POC
* Remove CK reference and ensure correct compute dtype
* Update unit tests
* ruff lint
* Fix missing keys
* Rename quant dtype parameter
* Rename quant dtype parameter
* Fix unittests for CPU build
